This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.8 build
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:41:21 -0700
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.8 build
- References: <CAPTDLfHfg2sBms85y4H=eCnHM66Lvm5zzkYk4kGi-tvye4ZZ9Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdTzUvkC6YzAcNGBK-Nm9F9G_C5Da7pDHbvqKOTabFSFnA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAPTDLfEheEa8P8eRd3v2ru3t+sAR-DhcoJY_UpJL4-p99zdP0g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAPTDLfFceJfmU_11Mq6J7vs3UbEY1xO_xHAB9cg2dAVkjgZvaQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKOQZ8wHoy58r10CP+uxOLGANuWo81Z4vKBDrbWCoFgeUOBKtw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAPTDLfGDO8DW1nw-_t1EaeCmW0tRewYsdr9m9GbvH2PQahGqvg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAKOQZ8zuWn9WeA1sw9GfCiu7QUYMWQ379NqSqtD59j6ChY6idg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAPTDLfGKDcdRR3Owb3GBud8gD8TRziimPq_eouJad_6S4k2w0A at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Kalai Rajah N <kalairajah@gmail.com> wrote:
> From elfutils nm ...
Thanks for the sample output. Clearly the output formats are quite
different.
You're right about -p vs. -P, I did get that wrong. But evidently the
two nm programs don't even agree about portable output. And the awk
script in libgcc/Makefile.in does not expect -P output.
I have no quick fix here, other than to use the GNU binutils nm.
You may want to open a bug report about this, but I don't know whether
the bug report should be against GCC or the elfutils.
Ian