This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++0x and C++11 status

From: Miles Bader <miles at gnu dot org>
To: Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:21:36 +0900
Subject: Re: C++0x and C++11 status
References: <CAMEoF_HGmqoqW0EhmOtCX1p=vRMFPtrW0HgEWkavNTOpQ_8GBQ@mail.gmail.com>

Michael Powell <mwpowellhtx@gmail.com> writes:
> Question: as I work through the standards and apply them in our
> application, what features can I leverage today, and should I steer
> clear from?
>
> For instance, it seems that lambdas and expressions are fairly well up
> to date? Meanwhile, threading, concurrency help not so much?

Try this table:

   http://wiki.apache.org/stdcxx/C%2B%2B0xCompilerSupport

It's pretty up-to-date, includes many popular compilers, and mostly
gives the compiler version where various features were added:

The table doesn't include threading, but my personal experience is
that the basic C++11 threading (std::thread, std::mutex, etc) stuff
works pretty well in gcc 4.7.  Very usable.

-miles

-- 
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra.  Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath.  At night the ice weasels come.  --Nietzsche

References:
- C++0x and C++11 status
  - From: Michael Powell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]