This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC assembler directive details

From: mohancloudworld <mohancloudworld at gmail dot com>
To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:40:13 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: GCC assembler directive details
References: <1361606980889-916523.post@n5.nabble.com> <CADj25HNEEWHXgscKGYWrGM-w0DT7f==SizP3x5VJh=ogc7oPbw@mail.gmail.com> <1361618773432-916534.post@n5.nabble.com> <CADj25HM+yJ6Ec9ksA7YGHyD5+yXHjKXwVdyMjm9DxYJK3JZyWQ@mail.gmail.com>

> You probably misunderstand the usage of '.type' directive.
> It is not used to describe the size of data type.

May be I am wrong, but I think there will be some connection between a
variable and the value associated with the corresponding  ".type" and ".scl"
. I am looking for those details.



--
View this message in context: http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/GCC-assembler-directive-details-tp916523p916560.html
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

References:
- GCC assembler directive details
  - From: mohancloudworld
- Re: GCC assembler directive details
  - From: Chung-Ju Wu
- Re: GCC assembler directive details
  - From: mohancloudworld
- Re: GCC assembler directive details
  - From: Chung-Ju Wu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]