This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: builtin assembler constraints

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Grobman Alexander-R53196 <R53196 at freescale dot com>
Cc: "gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 15:07:37 -0800
Subject: Re: builtin assembler constraints
References: <C427FDCFD7088C418DC739BD57D5ABF229420A@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> <CAKOQZ8x+hmTkMJPFh_W90_2tRSitkfwJvmV1FCvSU3vFW7Nkag@mail.gmail.com> <C427FDCFD7088C418DC739BD57D5ABF22942E5@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net> <CAKOQZ8yMRiYQOJ3BrTquS0MSoHHRU-Gpus9xKx6ipF-1zKC05g@mail.gmail.com> <C427FDCFD7088C418DC739BD57D5ABF2294317@039-SN1MPN1-006.039d.mgd.msft.net>

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Grobman Alexander-R53196
<R53196@freescale.com> wrote:
> "
> The valid set of registers for any argument are always expressed through constraints.
> "
>
> So if valid set is r5-r12 how do I express that?

As far as I know there is no existing constraint to express that, so
you would have to add a new one.

Ian

References:
- RE: builtin assembler constraints
  - From: Grobman Alexander-R53196
- Re: builtin assembler constraints
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: builtin assembler constraints
  - From: Grobman Alexander-R53196
- Re: builtin assembler constraints
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- RE: builtin assembler constraints
  - From: Grobman Alexander-R53196

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]