This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [HarfBuzz] does graphite affect the c++ munging? Does -On?

From: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame at googlemail dot com>
To: James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org, harfbuzz at lists dot freedesktop dot org, Philipp Thomas <Philipp dot Thomas2 at gmx dot net>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:41:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [HarfBuzz] does graphite affect the c++ munging? Does -On?
References: <m3mwyxklsi.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <CAH6eHdQgYskqKjQ5DJuE5=jpompu0sqKQDULFEiNUmCuHxmhJA@mail.gmail.com> <m3hap4lv67.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <5bbe989etaiq2aps9euiflmjbko3o4029d@4ax.com> <m3625jlxug.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>

On 5/11/12 18:15, James Cloos wrote:

[Background for the harfbuzz readers:

hb fails to compile with icu 50_rc and gcc 4.7.2 with an inconsistancy
between what icu provides for LEFontInstance::mapCharsToGlyphs() and
that hb wants.]

FYI, https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101179 discusses a similar-sounding issue. You might want to keep an eye on any developments there.

JK

References:
- does graphite affect the c++ munging? Does -On?
  - From: James Cloos
- Re: does graphite affect the c++ munging? Does -On?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: does graphite affect the c++ munging? Does -On?
  - From: James Cloos
- Re: does graphite affect the c++ munging? Does -On?
  - From: Philipp Thomas
- Re: does graphite affect the c++ munging? Does -On?
  - From: James Cloos

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]