This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bootstrap build bigger than non-bootstrap?

From: Christer Solskogen <christer dot solskogen at gmail dot com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:35:07 +0100
Subject: Re: bootstrap build bigger than non-bootstrap?
References: <jjikd3$ka4$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAH6eHdRLhj4s+D=o6p4MEJejLk3i3zQMBkm_XY-X-5f8QoNNeg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 March 2012 16:37, Christer Solskogen wrote:
>> How come a bootstrap build of gcc is almost triple the size as a
>> non-boostrap build?
>
>
> By what measure, disk space used by the build dir?

No, because that would make sense :-) I mean the resulting binaries.


-- 
chs,

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bootstrap build bigger than non-bootstrap?
  - From: Christer Solskogen

References:
- bootstrap build bigger than non-bootstrap?
  - From: Christer Solskogen
- Re: bootstrap build bigger than non-bootstrap?
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]