This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: bootstrap comparison failure with bootstrap-lto

Matt Hargett <matt@use.net> writes:

>> Looking at this, I think that this kind of test is going to fail when
>> using -flto and gold, because gold is going to report that the symbols
>> listed in the .ctors and .init_array sections are not visible from the
>> outside.  Unfortunately this is not simple to fix in gold.  In fact, I'm
>> not sure it's possible in the general case.
>
> Do we have enough info to file an actionable bug (or bugs)? if so, should I file it under the bootstrap component?

I filed http://gcc.gnu.org/PR51225 .

I'm testing a patch to add -fno-lto when running that test in the
configure script.

Ian
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]