This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
How 'experimental' is -std=c++0x
- From: Syncopated <joshchia at gmail dot com>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:10:55 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: How 'experimental' is -std=c++0x
-std=c++0x support in gcc is said to be 'experimental'. Even a macro used to
detect c++0x is __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__.
How experimental is 'experimental'? Does it mean that gcc has not much test
coverage with -std=c++0x compared to without? Does it mean there's a much
high chance of getting incorrect generated code even with source code that's
c++98?
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-%27experimental%27-is--std%3Dc%2B%2B0x-tp32857653p32857653.html
Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.