This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Re : gcc analyze tools

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: kevin diggs <diggskevin38 at gmail dot com>
Cc: charfi asma <charfiasma at yahoo dot fr>, Andi Hellmund <andi at mail dot lxgcc dot net>, gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:49:18 -0700
Subject: Re: Re : gcc analyze tools
References: <be00236b-e3d6-4616-8310-b205c3a78325@mail> <1311598283.11178.YahooMailRC@web28505.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <mcrk4b5op3q.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <CAKTLLVQuaXYcuef1SvP_bx33XoW7UhtyLh+z=cmpZA4SKJX1eQ@mail.gmail.com>

kevin diggs <diggskevin38@gmail.com> writes:

> Do you know when the changes were made (when did GCC go to hand
> written lexers and parsers?)? 3.4.6 still uses a bison parser, right?
> I think it uses a hand written lexer (built into the preprocessor?).

The C++ parser stopped using bison in gcc 3.4.  The C parser stopped
using bison in gcc 4.1.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re : gcc analyze tools
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- Re: gcc analyze tools
  - From: Andi Hellmund
- Re : gcc analyze tools
  - From: charfi asma
- Re: Re : gcc analyze tools
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Re : gcc analyze tools
  - From: kevin diggs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]