This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PIC is wasteful

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Agner Fog <agner at agner dot org>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org, Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:56:20 -0700
Subject: Re: PIC is wasteful
References: <4E03410F.10201@agner.org> <mcrfwn0ctg0.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106232132160.7631@laptop-mg.saclay.inria.fr> <4E044638.7090505@agner.org> <4E044977.2020007@redhat.com> <4E0464CE.4050201@agner.org> <mcrwrgb9rw3.fsf@coign.corp.google.com> <4E04AE54.9000105@agner.org>

Agner Fog <agner@agner.org> writes:

> On 24-06-2011 17:21, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> Is there no way to avoid 32 bit absolute addresses in 64 bit mode
>>> other than -fpic which has the undesired effect of using GOT and PLT
>>> entries?
>> -mcmodel=large.
> The large model is not supported. If it was, it would probably be
> inefficient.

The large model certainly is supported.

What version of gcc are you using?

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIC is wasteful
  - From: Agner Fog

References:
- PIC is wasteful
  - From: Agner Fog
- Re: PIC is wasteful
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PIC is wasteful
  - From: Marc Glisse
- Re: PIC is wasteful
  - From: Agner Fog
- Re: PIC is wasteful
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: PIC is wasteful
  - From: Agner Fog
- Re: PIC is wasteful
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PIC is wasteful
  - From: Agner Fog

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]