This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: telling GCC that a pointer cannot be NULL

From: Igor Bukanov <igor at mir2 dot org>
To: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david dot kirkby at onetel dot net>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 13:11:14 +0200
Subject: Re: telling GCC that a pointer cannot be NULL
References: <BANLkTimU35Ss1Rfc8CG0=AKur9zzj2C+_A@mail.gmail.com> <4DCA5A5B.6040501@onetel.net>

On 11 May 2011 11:43, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kirkby@onetel.net> wrote:
> Personally I would look at writing portable code, not making it GCC
> specific.

Compiler specific code allows to verify quickly the maximum
performance gain from a particular change without refactoring a
substantial amount of code.

References:
- telling GCC that a pointer cannot be NULL
  - From: Igor Bukanov
- Re: telling GCC that a pointer cannot be NULL
  - From: Dr. David Kirkby

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]