This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: problem porting my application to new gcc (non-const reference )
>What if you change theClass->constructor to &class_::constructor instead?
That didn't work and I got the same error as before, however
class_::constructor?worked :)
Thanks for your help and hints.?
// Naderan *Mahmood;
----- Original Message ----
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@yahoo.com>
Cc: gcc <gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Wed, March 30, 2011 3:42:13 PM
Subject: Re: problem porting my application to new gcc (non-const reference )
On 30 March 2011 11:30, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
> I rewrte the neccessary funtion definitions again to be clear:
...
> static API::conf_object_t * constructor(API::parse_object_t * aParseObject) {
OK, this is a static function, that's what I was asking.
> ? template <class CppObjectClass >
> ? class Factory {
> ??? typedef Class<CppObjectClass> class_;
> ??? class_ * theClass;
> ???? public:
> ??? Factory() {
> ????? static class_ theStaticClass;
> ????? theClass = &theStaticClass;
> ??? }
> ??? typename class_::object_type create(std::string aSimName) {
> ????? API::conf_object_t * object = aux_::NewObject_stub(
> ??????? const_cast<API::conf_class_t *>( theClass->getSimClass() ), aSimName,
> theClass->constructor);
What if you change theClass->constructor to &class_::constructor instead?