This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: x86_64: is there an option to always do RIP relative addressing for globals?

From: Mike Cui <cuicui at gmail dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:44:44 -0800
Subject: Re: x86_64: is there an option to always do RIP relative addressing for globals?
References: <AANLkTik87a1a1SoSSz8iWOF-hkQwxT9oC7qTZxZaTZ6x@mail.gmail.com> <mcrd3nna16p.fsf@google.com>

> I think you can get approximately what you want by using "#pragma GCC
> visibility push(protected)" at the start of some header file to give all
> symbols, including all external symbols, protected visibility. ÂThen
> compile with -fpic. ÂI don't know if that will cover all cases. ÂIt
> seems like kind of a special purpose requirement.
>

Awesome! That seems to do exactly what I want! Thanks!

References:
- x86_64: is there an option to always do RIP relative addressing for globals?
  - From: Mike Cui
- Re: x86_64: is there an option to always do RIP relative addressing for globals?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]