This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declarationâ

From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: noloader at gmail dot com
Cc: Nathan Ridge <zeratul976 at hotmail dot com>, gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 00:40:27 +0000
Subject: Re: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declarationâ
References: <BLU162-w121954B8D71C62561A140096080@phx.gbl> <AANLkTi=d_1YkGujdQAtSJCB4PdO24w=fXKpygWX8yAKs@mail.gmail.com>

On 5 January 2011 00:30, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> Try T t(S(1, 0.1));

That's not valid in C++03 or C++0x, S has no suitable constructor.

> I'm not sure C++0X would help (see Intializer Lists at
> http://www2.research.att.com/~bs/C++0xFAQ.html)

Initializer lists are exactly what's needed to make S{ 1, 0.1 } a
valid initialization.

References:
- gcc interp rets C++0x initializ ation cons truct as f unction de claration‏
  - From: Nathan Ridge
- Re: gcc interprets C++0x initialization construct as function declarationâ
  - From: Jeffrey Walton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]