This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: class partial specialization error (might be g++'s)

From: Rodolfo Schulz de Lima <rodolfo at rodsoft dot org>
To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:05:29 -0300
Subject: Re: class partial specialization error (might be g++'s)
References: <i0i7dl$cmn$1@dough.gmane.org> <AANLkTilBhdnStmH9hyPmegNAIFjdJG8GetyzLHuyNo34@mail.gmail.com> <i0idd6$5eh$1@dough.gmane.org>

Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
> I've just tested with gcc-4.4.1 and it also compiled. Is this a
> regression or gcc-4.5 is somehow more compliant to the standard in this
> respect?

Since it looks like a regression, I've created ticket #44753 to track
this issue.

[]s,
rod

References:
- class partial specialization error (might be g++'s)
  - From: Rodolfo Lima
- Re: class partial specialization error (might be g++'s)
  - From: Tiago Maluta
- Re: class partial specialization error (might be g++'s)
  - From: Rodolfo Schulz de Lima

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]