This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC-4.3.3 with MIPS crossed generate relocation type 0x7f (127) which is unknown
- From: naveen yadav <yad dot naveen at gmail dot com>
- To: clm at codesourcery dot com, gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 11:54:53 +0530
- Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.3 with MIPS crossed generate relocation type 0x7f (127) which is unknown
- References: <9bde694e0909302304w39e5d2a5w9d8ada82b8f7c63a@mail.gmail.com> <4AC46957.4060407@redhat.com> <9bde694e0910010428k480a2899l6c0003bccbf7c567@mail.gmail.com> <87ocoqddhw.fsf@firetop.home> <4AC52089.8010701@caviumnetworks.com> <9bde694e0910060511g3c5047e5y5e39844e354ffb2c@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:41 PM, naveen yadav <yad.naveen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am using version prelink_0.0.20090311 from Ubountu. After applying
> patch as mention by Richard Sandiford. i got following problem .
> i am using gcc-4.3.3.
> When we do prelinking we got following error.
>
> and then prelinking it with R_MIPS_JUMP_SLOT we get these results
> Laying out 2 libraries in virtual address space 2c000000-3c000000
> Assigned virtual address space slots for libraries:
> /li/ld.so.1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2c000000-2c02ea84
> /li/libc.so.6 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?2c040000-2c192c10
> Prelinking /li/ld.so.1
> Prelinking /li/libc.so.6
> Prelinking /main
> ./prelink: /li/libc.so.6: Conflict 0000b914 not found in any relocation
> ./prelink: /li/ld.so.1: Conflict 000004a8 not found in any relocation
> ./prelink: /li/ld.so.1: Conflict 00000498 not found in any relocation
> ./prelink: /li/ld.so.1: Conflict 00000488 not found in any relocation
> ./prelink: /li/ld.so.1: Conflict 00000478 not found in any relocation
> ./prelink: /li/ld.so.1: Conflict 00000458 not found in any relocation
>
>
> Will you pls suggest what is reason
>
> Best regards
> Naveen
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:05 AM, David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
>> Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>>
>>> You need the patch posted here:
>>>
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/prelink/2008-q4/msg00001.html
>>>
>>
>> Interesting. ?In the past I have wondered where prelink was hosted.
>>
>> There seems to be absolutely no mention of it in any sourceware.org web
>> pages I can see.
>>
>> Do you suppose someone in-the-know could create a small project web page
>> with links to things like browsing the repository and mailing lists?
>>
>> That way I wouldn't have to extract it from the Fedora source RPMs.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David Daney
>>
>