This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: valreg at calls.c is 0 at a moment

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: "Kim\, Eunchan" <helpbygrace at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:42:15 -0700
Subject: Re: valreg at calls.c is 0 at a moment
References: <507f7d510910020331lc7ceb70r21d009da026674c1@mail.gmail.com> <mcrpr95rca1.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <507f7d510910021949h3dad9444we82ab704c075e5a@mail.gmail.com>

"Kim, Eunchan" <helpbygrace@gmail.com> writes:

> I have a question. what exactly aggregate_value_p(exp, fndecl) means?
> so, if aggregate_value_p is not true. May this problem be solved?

aggregate_value_p means that EXP returns an aggregate--something which
must be passed in memory rather than in registers.  See the comment
above the definition of the function in function.c.  It's very strange
for malloc to return an aggregate; it normally returns a pointer.

Ian

References:
- valreg at calls.c is 0 at a moment
  - From: Kim, Eunchan
- Re: valreg at calls.c is 0 at a moment
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: valreg at calls.c is 0 at a moment
  - From: Kim, Eunchan

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]