This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -fpie vs -fpic

From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu dot lacage at gmail dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: gcc-help <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:30:05 +0200
Subject: Re: -fpie vs -fpic
References: <74fef6df0907230047v69eac7dbq5d292bf6b26be5e1@mail.gmail.com> <m3prbr7qw9.fsf@google.com>

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Ian Lance Taylor<iant@google.com> wrote:

>> Which brings me to more questions:
>> 1) why does "gcc -fpie -pie" fail to work ? Is this not the
>> recommended way to use -fpie and -pie ? Could it be that -fpie is
>> using the static tls model when it should not ?
>
> Per above, I think it's a linker bug.

Is this the proper place to report such a bug under the 'binutils' product ?
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi

Mathieu
-- 
Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@gmail.com>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -fpie vs -fpic
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- -fpie vs -fpic
  - From: Mathieu Lacage
- Re: -fpie vs -fpic
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]