This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: How to inline a huge m68k code?


ami_stuff wrote:
> 
> 
> Dnia 13 lipca 2009 16:35 Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> napisaÅ(a):
> 
>> ami_stuff wrote:
>>>>> Ok, so it is a GCC's bug?
>>>> It's perhaps an optimization that gcc doesn't do.  But then
>>>> there is an infinite number of optimizations that gcc doesn't do.
>>> How should I modify GCC's inline to repleace MULH function (to make it compatible)?
>> What for?  I posted sample code that should work.
> 
> Could you tell me what I do wrong?

Not until you tell me about the results from the code I posted!  :-)

> 
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> 
> #define MULH_ORG(a,b) (((int64_t)(a) * (int64_t)(b))>>32)
>
> #define MULH_ASM(xh, xl, a, b)

This won't work because xh and xl are outputs.

Andrew.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]