This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Help with building gcc

From: Revital1 Eres <ERES at il dot ibm dot com>
To: Kai Ruottu <kai dot ruottu at wippies dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:34:43 +0200
Subject: Re: Help with building gcc
References: <OF93A8E2E8.A10C4E8C-ONC225757E.00364ACB-C225757E.0036B458@il.ibm.com> <49C24E62.5060402@sbcglobal.net> <OF10FD697E.C1BA4102-ONC225757E.004CD466-C225757E.004D8FC3@il.ibm.com> <49C25F58.7030908@wippies.com> <OF3690114D.5162A9F7-ONC225757E.0052C296-C225757E.0052D969@il.ibm.com> <49C263AA.70206@wippies.com>

Hello,
>
> Ok, the '/lib' and '/usr/lib' should have the 32-bit libs,
> the '/lib64' and '/usr/lib64' the 64-bit (default) ones...
> This means that you SHOULD have them both installed before
> starting to configure and build GCC.

I see that all the directories you mentioned are installed
on the machine.

> Probably you got the error when the build tried to link
> the optional 32-bit 'libgcc_s.so.1' but there were no
> 32-bit development libraries installed yet...

I see libgcc_s.so.1 installed under /lib

Thanks,
Revital

References:
- Help with building gcc
  - From: Revital1 Eres
- Re: Help with building gcc
  - From: Tim Prince
- Re: Help with building gcc
  - From: Revital1 Eres
- Re: Help with building gcc
  - From: Kai Ruottu
- Re: Help with building gcc
  - From: Revital1 Eres
- Re: Help with building gcc
  - From: Kai Ruottu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]