This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: How to use __attribute__((__may_alias__))


John Fine <johnsfine@verizon.net> writes:

> Idea 3
>
> DAT* pp=foo();
> union { DAT** p1; DAT_PTR* p2 } ppp;
> ppp.p1 = &pp;
> ppp.p2->bar(x);
>
> Fundamentally, I need an object to be both a DAT* and a DAT_PTR, but a
> union of those two is impossible because of the constructor and
> destructor in the class DAT_PTR.  So if I use a union, I only know how
> to use a union of DAT** and DAT_PTR*.  I don't know if that covers the
> situation.
>
> The action that gets optimized away is the store of the result of foo
> into pp.  The union seems to only protect optimizations of ppp.
>
> The object that needs the protection is pp.  That is a DAT* that may
> be aliased to something else (so the store into it should not be
> optimized away).  So "Idea 2" above seems the most logical fit.  But
> I'm getting confused over which level of indirection is affected by
> the attribute.

When you can't use a union, another option is memcpy.


> Maybe it needs to be on the other side of the problem, such as:
>
> Idea 4
>
> DAT* pp=foo();
> typedef DAT_PTR __attribute__((__may_alias__)) DAT_PTR_ALIAS;
> reinterpret_cast<DAT_PTR_ALIAS*>(&pp)->bar(x);

The may_alias attribute should be on the type to which things point.  SO
you want something like

typedef DAT __attribute__ ((__may_alias__)) DAT_ALIAS;

and then use DAT_ALIAS*.

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]