This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Redundant warning with -Weffc++

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: David Sveningsson <ext at sidvind dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2009 18:48:30 +0000
Subject: Re: Redundant warning with -Weffc++
References: <49B404C6.5010605@sidvind.com> <49B40690.8050406@redhat.com> <49B411A4.9060107@sidvind.com>

David Sveningsson wrote:

> Yes but if a field in the union is fully initialized it shouldn't warn
> about the others. That's kind of the point with a union.

True.  I don't think there is an easy answer for this.  It's the usual
free software cry: "Patches welcome!"

Andrew.

References:
- Redundant warning with -Weffc++
  - From: David Sveningsson
- Re: Redundant warning with -Weffc++
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Redundant warning with -Weffc++
  - From: David Sveningsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]