This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: atomic builtin routines

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)" <sundara dot vardhan at ge dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 17:17:46 +0100
Subject: Re: atomic builtin routines
References: <8E460D1B58F94945A20AA70D4D41430D052DE90A@ALPMLVEM08.e2k.ad.ge.com>

Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy) wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> I have used __sync_lock_test_and_set() routines in gcc 4.1.1 with -march=pentiumpro successfully.
> Are there equivalent set of routines or any other functions that I can use for spin locks in gcc 3.4.6?

We didn't rename them, if that's what you are asking.  Sorry.

This is when they were added.  Any gcc before that doesn't have them.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg00915.html

Andrew.

References:
- atomic builtin routines
  - From: Vardhan, Sundara (GE Infra, Energy)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]