This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
ignore that strict-aliasing warning ?
- From: Michael Haubenwallner <michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:22:42 +0200
- Subject: ignore that strict-aliasing warning ?
Hi,
please help me understand these strict-aliasing warnings:
$ cat test.c
/* 1*/ extern void allocate(int size, void** p);
/* 2*/
/* 3*/ typedef struct X {
/* 4*/ char A;
/* 5*/ } X;
/* 6*/
/* 7*/ X* test1(void)
/* 8*/ {
/* 9*/ X *x;
/*10*/ allocate((int)sizeof(X), (void**)&x); /* current code */
/*11*/ allocate((int)sizeof(X), &x); /* as older gcc warned here already */
/*12*/ return x;
/*13*/ }
/*14*/
/*15*/ X* test2(void)
/*16*/ {
/*17*/ union {
/*18*/ X *x;
/*19*/ void* v;
/*20*/ } u;
/*21*/ allocate((int)sizeof(X), &u.v);
/*22*/ allocate((int)sizeof(X), (void**)&u);
/*23*/ return u.x;
/*24*/ }
$ gcc -Wall -O2 -c test.c -Wstrict-aliasing=2
test.c: In function 'test1':
test.c:10: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
test.c:11: warning: passing argument 2 of 'allocate' from incompatible pointer type
test.c: In function 'test2':
test.c:22: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer might break strict-aliasing rules
Strange is that line 10 "will", but line 22 "might" break
strict-aliasing rules.
Do I really need the union here like in test2() and line 21 ?
Or is there another "correct" way to get rid of warning in line 10 ?
Thanks!
/haubi/
--
17.-19. Oktober 2007
Salomon Automation am 24. Deutschen Logistik-Kongress der BVL, Berlin; Stand W/09
14. November 2007
Salomon Automation an der LogIT Retail im Leopoldsmuseum in Wien
Salomon Automation GmbH - Friesachstrasse 15 - A-8114 Friesach bei Graz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Friesach bei Graz
UID-NR:ATU28654300 - Firmenbuchnummer: 49324 K
Firmenbuchgericht: Landesgericht für Zivilrechtssachen Graz