This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: constructors/destructors compiled twice

From: Kövesdi György <kgy at deverto dot hu>
To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:17:59 +0200
Subject: Re: constructors/destructors compiled twice
References: <200706201836.02600.kgy@deverto.hu> <467AB1D4.B785D90F@dessent.net> <467B7A0C.1050602@informatik.uni-erlangen.de>

> Hm... This brings a pragmatic alternative into my mind:
> Instead of having multiple names for the same function body gcc could
> still generate distinct functions at different adresses that just jmp to
> the identical parts of the code.
Yes, it would be reasonable even for smaller embedded systems. It hits my 
fancy.

Regards
K. Gy.

References:
- constructors/destructors compiled twice
  - From: KÃvesdi GyÃrgy
- Re: constructors/destructors compiled twice
  - From: Brian Dessent
- Re: constructors/destructors compiled twice
  - From: Daniel Lohmann

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]