This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
bad user, or optimization bug with worked-around lvalue casts ?
- From: Michael Haubenwallner <michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 16:35:40 +0100
- Subject: bad user, or optimization bug with worked-around lvalue casts ?
Hi,
after switching to gcc-4.1.1 from gcc-3.4.5, I'm facing a problem with
this code searching for non-blank in a string (extracted test-case):
#include <stdio.h>
int check(const void *pvBuf)
{
for(; *((char*)pvBuf) == ' '; ++ *((char**)&pvBuf));
return *((char*)pvBuf);
}
int main(void)
{
printf("%d\n", check(" x"));
return 0;
}
When building without optimization, it works as expected.
When building with -O2 or higher, the loop hangs.
This seems to be platform independant, as it occurs on x86-linux as well
as powerpc-aix, hppa-hpux, ia64-hpux, x86-solaris and sparc-solaris.
Now the question is:
Is this a user-bug only, not looking at the output of "-Wall" (because
this code builds and works successfully for 5 years now),
or is it a gcc-bug too, producing working code without optimization
and non-working code with optimization level >= 2 ?
And: can this code be changed without using an intermediate variable ?
Thanks,
haubi