This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Inline assembly and extended instruction sets

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Michele Dall'Arno <michele dot dallarno at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:17:29 +0100
Subject: Re: Inline assembly and extended instruction sets
References: <42CC6F51.4070007@gmail.com>

Michele Dall'Arno wrote:

Is the union-way the best way to make C and asm able to exchange such vectors? Why the program doesn't compile with union pointers? Any kind of corrections and explanations would be greatly appreciated!

use the mmx builtins, then you won't have to write asms at all.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

References:
- Inline assembly and extended instruction sets
  - From: Michele Dall'Arno

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]