This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday 09 of March 2005 00:07, Victor Shoup wrote: > So my question is, to anyone who know, is the above incantation > (and similarly for unsigned types) a fairly reliable way to get > a 128-bit type on a 64-bit machine with gcc? use __int128_t type. -- /* Copyright (C) 2003, SCO, Inc. This is valuable Intellectual Property. */ #define say(x) lie(x)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |