This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: compile or not compile


Alexandre Oliva wrote:

On Jul 2, 2004, llewelly@xmission.com wrote:



Karol Szkudlarek <karol@mikronika.com.pl> writes:





typedef int my_int;





class ALibraryClass { public: int foo(const my_int&) { return 0; }
int foo(const bool&) { return 0; } };





class BClientClass { public: enum Items { item1=1000, item2=2000 };





void test() { ALibraryClass a; a.foo(BClientClass::item1);





This should select A::foo(const my_int&) unambigously; enum to int is
a promotion (see 4.5) while enum to bool is a conversion (4.12)
and a promotion is a better match than conversion, (13.3.3.2/4).



But there's reference binding requiring conversion, so both are user-defined conversions [over.ics.ref]/1, and none of them is better than the other, because the tie-breaker is only the second conversion sequence [over.ics.rank]/3, that is an exact match in both cases.



OK. But why this compiles without error with gcc (3.3) on one platform
and one another (gcc 3.3) it doesn't?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]