This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc name mangling

From: y2bismil at engmail dot uwaterloo dot ca
To: GCC- help <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:24:45 -0400
Subject: Re: gcc name mangling
References: <5.2.1.1.0.20031021070608.00b0e160@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>

Okay, 
reading the description, it seems to make a big deal of not being binary
compatible with code not compiled with this option.

Perhaps the best solution would be to simply prepend all assembler names with
underscores?

Anyone have any experience with using gAS and GCC together.  What is the common
practice?  I hope I'm not imagining, but I did some work using gcc and external
assembler (s files), using the m68k.  I don't recall name mangling being an issue.

Yamin

Quoting Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@adobe.com>:

> Hi Yamin,
> 
> Checkout the -fleading-underscore / -fno-leading-underscore flag.
> 
> Note:  this is a powerful flag, since it has sweeping effects.
> 
> HTH,
> --Eljay
> 
> 




----------------------------------------
This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca

References:
- Re: gcc name mangling
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]