This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: "not-in-charge"

From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay at adobe dot com>
To: y2bismil at engmail dot uwaterloo dot ca, gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:49:56 -0500
Subject: Re: "not-in-charge"
References: <1065816716.3f87128ca2486@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca><1065813162.3f8704aaef861@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca><1065816716.3f87128ca2486@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca>

Hi Yamin,

Cominging object code from different tools can be tricky.  Does the pharlap assembler follow the same ABI conventions as the GNU tools?

That may be a rhetorical question.  I do not know the answer.  On Solaris, since the OS has a well-defined ABI, different tools from different vendors (more-or-less) play nice together.

What platform are your working with again?  (RedHat Linux 9.0?  Mandrake Linux 9.2?  SunOS 5.9?  Cygwin 1.5.5 / NT 5.1?  Darwin 6.6?  Amiga 3.9?  Other...?)

I think your question may be answered here, <http://developer.novell.com/research/sections/codebreak/devqa/2000/november/q001101.htm> ... the same answer as per the MetroWerks CodeWarrior Professional Development Kit.  Not the answer (I imagine) you'd be hoping for.

HTH,
--Eljay

References:
- Re: "not-in-charge"
  - From: y2bismil
- "not-in-charge"
  - From: y2bismil
- Re: "not-in-charge"
  - From: y2bismil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]