This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
PowerPC G5, 64-bit long long, bit counting and inline assembler...
- From: Gordon Royle <gordon at csse dot uwa dot edu dot au>
- To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Oct 2003 10:32:27 +0800
- Subject: PowerPC G5, 64-bit long long, bit counting and inline assembler...
Hi,
I am trying to speed up some C code and find that I need to know details
about compilation and assembler that I cannot seem to find either via
FAQs or Google.
I have a program that represents sets using the bit pattern in a 64-bit
word, and I repeatedly have to answer the question "Does this word have
exactly 2 bits set".
At the moment, I am using a bit manipulation trick as follows:
#define IF2BITS(x) x &= x-1; if (x && !(x&(x-1)))
(this relies on the fact that x&(x-1) strips off the least significant
bit that is set)
In order to use 64-bit words, I am using the type "long long".
Now I recently gained access to a Mac G5, with the 64-bit PowerPC G5
chip, and so I naively expected a substantial increase in performance
over my existing testing machine (in case it is relevant the chips are
2.667GHz Xeon vs 2GHz G5) because presumably gcc must "simulate" the
64-bit behaviour of "long long" on a 32-bit machine while it can do it
natively on a G5.
But in practice, I only gained about 20% - even when I did a test
program that *only* did a few billion operations like &, |, ^ and the
IF2BITS macro above....
Is there something important that I am missing, or is this to be
expected? Can I check that it *is* actually using the G5 in native
64-bit mode?
In addition, is there a faster way to check if a word has exactly 2-bits
set? Would there be any gain from trying to inline assembler to do just
this operation?
Thanks in advance..
Gordon
--
Dr. Gordon Royle, http://www.csse.uwa.edu.au, gordon(AT)csse.uwa.edu.au
--