This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?

From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay at adobe dot com>
To: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:19:14 -0500
Subject: Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
References: <5.2.1.1.0.20030911114552.00b6af48@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com><5.2.1.1.0.20030911110503.00bb5d20@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com><5.2.1.1.0.20030911110503.00bb5d20@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com><5.2.1.1.0.20030911114552.00b6af48@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>

Thanks for everyone's input!

When these things crop up, I'll put in the extra set of parens to delineate the item as a parameter to a definition, which disambiguates the sitation so that the compiler doesn't interpret it as a declaration.

CodeWarrior and MSVC should digest the extra set of parens without complaint.

Sincerely,
--Eljay

I love this forum!

References:
- Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen
- Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen
- Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
  - From: Oliver Kullmann

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]