This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Is this a bug?
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: "Lev Assinovsky" <LAssinovsky at algorithm dot aelita dot com>
- Cc: "Gcc-Bugs (E-mail)" <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Gcc-Help (E-mail)" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 12 Aug 2003 15:56:54 -0300
- Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <3F6F4712B759A34ABD453A8B39C10D62CCAF8F@bagman.edm.com>
On Aug 12, 2003, "Lev Assinovsky" <LAssinovsky@algorithm.aelita.com> wrote:
> gcc 3.2.3, HPUX-11.00:
> t.cpp: In static member function `static const item* A::f()':
> t.cpp:6: warning: sorry: semantics of inline function static data `const item
> arr[1]' are wrong (you'll wind up with multiple copies)
> t.cpp:6: warning: you can work around this by removing the initializer
It's not as much of a bug, but rather a limitation AFAIK imposed by
the object file of the platform you've chosen. GCC requires weak
symbols in order to implement this feature correctly, and 32-bit HP-UX
object files don't support them (completely?).
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer