This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sizeof(function) functionality

From: Ben Davis <bndavis at ntlworld dot com>
To: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay at adobe dot com>,Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: Kristis Makris <kristis dot makris at asu dot edu>,gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 04:18:33 +0100
Subject: Re: sizeof(function) functionality
References: <orllv8u0d3.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <5.2.0.9.0.20030708221406.02754d70@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>
Reply-to: bnd25 at cam dot ac dot uk

On Wednesday 9 July 2003 4:17 am, Eljay Love-Jensen wrote:
> Macros don't honor things like () or {} or <> (i.e., templates) for whether
> a comma is considered for the preprocessor's consumption, or as part of the
> macro's parameter.  All your commas are belong to us.

They do honour ().

Ben

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sizeof(function) functionality
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen

References:
- Re: sizeof(function) functionality
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: sizeof(function) functionality
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]