This is the mail archive of the gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: sizeof(function) functionality


On Jul  7, 2003, Ben Davis <bndavis@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>> Besides, sizeof is supposed to return a compile-time
>> constant, but the size of a function is most often only known at
>> assembly time, or, worse, at link time, in case linker relaxations are
>> available.  And don't even get me started on ELF dynamic library
>> symbol binding and replacement rules :-)

> Well, the same mechanism that resolves references might be able to resolve 
> function sizes too, if the linker is built to handle this. Just a thought :)

References aren't compile-time constants.  Or, more precisely, they
aren't integral constants, usable wherever an integral constant is.
E.g., in case labels, enumeration constant assignments, global array
sizes, etc.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]