This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Build question regarding 64-bit HPUX 11.00
- To: <law at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Build question regarding 64-bit HPUX 11.00
- From: Robert A Nesius <rnesius at ichips dot intel dot com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 19:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
- cc: <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001 law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107061726550.27056-100000@plxw0032.pdx.intel.com>y
> ou write:
> > I also tried using an older gcc but that causes problems as well because
> > none of the older gcc builds I have really work well on HPUX 11.00. It
> > seems at this point asking the list for what the general approach for
> > this build is would be the best idea, or at least to verify 64-bit is
> > supported on HPUX 11.00 now. If not, then I guess I can try to build a
> > 32-bit version at least.
> You need to either have GCC which supports PA64, or you need to build a
> cross compiler which targets PA64, which can then be used to build a set
> of PA64 native tools.
>
> Ie, the classic bootstrap problem.
>
> I wouldn't even bother trying to build with HP's compiler. THere are so
> many things it does wrong it's not even funny.
Roger that. It seems a bit unnecessary since HP's ansic compiler
seems to work just fine while building the stage1 gcc, but the
stage1 gcc subsequently passes ld 32-bit and 64-bit objects
and the build blows up, so something isn't quite right. I'm not
convinced it's not a build engineering issue, but I lack the
knowledge to jump into the guts of this build and figure out where
the problem is if one does in fact exist.
Thanks for your response!
-Rob
>
>
> jeff
>
--
#include <sig.h>
------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Nesius rnesius@ichips.intel.com 503.712.2181
DPG Engineering Computing SW Applications Team