This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -fno-default-inline
- To: Mike Harrold <mharrold at cas dot org>
- Subject: Re: -fno-default-inline
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Date: 30 Jun 2001 01:31:34 -0300
- Cc: gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <200106291735.NAA03725@mah21awu.cas.org>
On Jun 29, 2001, Mike Harrold <mharrold@cas.org> wrote:
> Or is this a case of pleading with the libstdc++ folks to mark functions
> as inline where appropriate?
I'm not sure we should add redundant keywords to libstdc++ code to
make room for a non-standard extension. Is it really too hard for you
to move the member function definitions out of the class body, so that
the implicit inline Standard rule doesn't apply to them?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me