This is the mail archive of the
gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Preprocessor
- To: "GCC-List" <gcc-help at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: Preprocessor
- From: "Jean-Pierre Schwickerath" <gcc-list at schwicky dot net>
- Date: 11 Mar 2001 23:48:09 CET
- Reply-To: "Jean-Pierre Schwickerath" <gcc-list at schwicky dot net>
Hello,
I solved my problem with the re_max_failures by compiling a static version of
gcc 2.95.0 without libstdc++ and used it to compile a shared version of the
recent snapshot.
But I have a few packages who complain that the following construction is not
valid.
printf("%*s",
#ifdef ARGUMENT
16,
#else
8,
#endif
"");
However if the guys wrote it this way(for example in the gnu binutils) then
it's because it was valid.
Is there a change in the pre 3.0 version of gcc that makes this stuctor illegal
now?
Or is there just on of my packages that is not up-to-date and everything's all
right with the preprocessor?
Jean-Pierre
--
Jean-Pierre Schwickerath - Powered by GNU/LinuX!
E-Mail: email@schwicky.net - http://schwicky.net
PGP Key ID: 0x48C39212 - AIM: Schwicky - ICQ's UIN: 4690141
Nothing's impossible... Everything is relative!