This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/81977] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Issue with inline memcpy with optimizations enabled
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 08:07:23 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/81977] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Issue with inline memcpy with optimizations enabled
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-81977-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|X86_64 |x86_64-*-*
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to work| |4.6.4
Keywords| |wrong-code
Last reconfirmed| |2017-08-28
Component|c++ |tree-optimization
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|Issue with inline memcpy |[5/6/7/8 Regression] Issue
|with optimizations enabled |with inline memcpy with
| |optimizations enabled
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
Known to fail| |4.7.3, 4.8.5, 5.4.0, 6.4.0,
| |7.2.0
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. FRE does this. Mine.
int main() ()
{
struct Msg msg;
uint8_t * _3;
<bb 2> [100.00%]:
_3 = operator new [] (30);
MEM[(void *)&msg + 4B] = 289662039076023245;
MEM[(long unsigned int *)&msg + 12B] = 66051;
memcpy (_3, &MEM[(struct Payload *)&msg]._pref, 12);
printval (5655);
operator delete [] (_3);
msg ={v} {CLOBBER};
return 0;