This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/81814] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Incorrect behaviour at -O0 (conditional operator)
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 08:43:08 +0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/81814] [5/6/7/8 Regression] Incorrect behaviour at -O0 (conditional operator)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-81814-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81814
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81814
>
> Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
> Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
>
> --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Nope, nothing breaks. It occurred to me that we might get rid of it when I
> found out that the code comes from rms, 1992. :)
I'm all for it - maybe you can do one further verification step in
instrumenting the number of cases it triggers during bootstrap?
Might be a bit awkward to only detect the cases where an actual
transform happens ...