This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs
- From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 17:44:59 +0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/30065] Could use indexed addressing to reduce const costs
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-30065-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30065
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #5)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #3)
> > > Is there a test case for this PR?
> >
> > Reporter never provided a test case; closing
>
> Please do not close any SH related PR's just for the sake of reducing the
> number of PR's. I keep them open because they are actual issues.
Can I change the status to SUSPENDED or assign them to you instead? I'm not so
much trying to reduce the number of open PRs as I am trying to just move them
out of the WAITING queue. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/management.html says bugs
are only ever supposed to stay in the WAITING state for 3 months, after all.