This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/28859] GCC calls malloc from within signal context


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28859

--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 17 Jul 2017, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28859
> 
> Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>    Last reconfirmed|                            |2017-07-17
>      Ever confirmed|0                           |1
> 
> --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Do I understand it that practically impossible to handle that as we would have
> to somehow detect all malloc-family functions triggered after a crash_signal is
> executed?
> 
> In case of PR81382 we either need to have layout class not containing of types
> that can possibly allocate a memory via malloc, or we can have an env variable
> that will prevent displaying of locations if crash_signal happened? Would it be
> welcomed one of there approaches?

I think it's just not possible to easily do sth here, so we shouldn't care 
too much IMHO.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]