This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/81448] False positive -Werror=multistatement-macros in openssl


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81448

--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Guess we'll need the PR81364 fix for that.

Yes, although it would be good to require
a "{" only if cprefix##_ecb_encrypt(...) actually expands
to multiple stmts, if it expands to single stmt as here
BLOCK_CIPHER_ecb_loop() would be usable like for(;;)

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]