This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/77745] [5/6/7 Regression] Inconsistent application of aliasing rules


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77745

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |4.5.0
   Target Milestone|---                         |5.5
            Summary|Inconsistent application of |[5/6/7 Regression]
                   |aliasing rules              |Inconsistent application of
                   |                            |aliasing rules
      Known to fail|                            |5.4.0, 7.0

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
You know what you are right this is wrong code.

Note I am surprised we don't emit clobber barriers before operator new anyways
to say the life time of an object just started.  This will most likely solve
the issue overall.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]