This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/77283] [7 Regression] Revision 238005 disables loop unrolling


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77283

--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 39469
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39469&action=edit
patch

Ok, causes

FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69270.c scan-tree-dump-not dom3 "bit_xor"
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69270.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "Folded to: _[0-9]+ = 
0;" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69270.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "Folded to: _[0-9]+ = 
1;" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69270.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "Replaced
.bufferstep_
[0-9]+. with constant .0." 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69270.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "Replaced
.bufferstep_
[0-9]+. with constant .1." 1

which is where path-splitting exposes a jump threading opportunity it seems
as jump threading is not happy to perform the operation in one go.

Also my adjustment of gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-7.c was only good in my dev
tree for some reason.  Otherwise bootstrapped / tested on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]