This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug web/77275] Description of -l option refers only to static libraries, not dynamic/shared libraries
- From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 22:43:58 +0000
- Subject: [Bug web/77275] Description of -l option refers only to static libraries, not dynamic/shared libraries
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-77275-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77275
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2016-08-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom Payerle from comment #0)
> These should be corrected to include shared libraries, which may also be
> specified by the -l option. It would probably be good to add something
> along the lines of how the compiler selects if multiple files matching ---
The compiler doesn't select anything, the linker does. GCC just passes the
option directly to the linker.
> my experience is .so files are preferred to .a, but not sure if all library
> directories are searched for .so, then all searched for .a, or if each
> library directory in order is searched for .so then .a. Assuming the
> latter, something like
> <quote>
> The linker searches a standard list of directories, in order, for the first
> matching shared library (actually a file named liblibrary.so) or standard
> library (actually a file named liblibrary.a) that is found. If a matching
> shared library and static library are found in the same directory, the
> shared library is preferred.
> </quote>
That's not entirely accurate, the precise semantics depend on the linker, which
is not part of GCC and varies from platform to platform.
> The second line could be changed to something like
> <quote>
> The only difference between using an -l option and specifying a file name is
> that -l surrounds library with ‘lib’ and either '.so' and ‘.a’ and searches
> several directories
> </quote>
Or .dylib, or other OS-specific extensions.
I think it would be better to just say the details depend on the linker.