This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/72794] [7 regression] CF on spec2000/176.gcc after r238862.


https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72794

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #2)
> Yes, this option cures CF. Does it mean that we must compile spec2000
> with this flag?

Yes and it should be considered a portability flag.

Basically GNU90 and ISO C99 inline behave slightly different which is why you
are seeing this.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]