This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug driver/70783] -spec option behavior is different to implicit spec file
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 16:07:56 +0000
- Subject: [Bug driver/70783] -spec option behavior is different to implicit spec file
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-70783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70783
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andreas.G.JHOSS from comment #2)
> Hmm?
> So but how can I add and change implicitely a substitute rule then?
> I want to add certain libraries to build process permanently for certain
> platforms so I can get platform independent. And clearly I want to add a
> rule where I can disable this libararies explicitely. I thought this is far
> common how I do this.
>
> Must the user always state --spec to override/add a single substitue rule in
> gcc?
You dump the current specs and then you edit them as I mentioned in the
previous comment.