This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/66701] __cxxabiv1::__cxa_pure_virtual - can it take an argument of the pointer to the function that was called, please?
- From: "gcc-bugs at hussar dot demon.co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 21:15:44 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/66701] __cxxabiv1::__cxa_pure_virtual - can it take an argument of the pointer to the function that was called, please?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-66701-4 at http dot gcc dot gnu dot org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #2 from Jason <gcc-bugs at hussar dot demon.co.uk> ---
(With due sense of dread:) I note that the __cxxabiv1 seems to have a v1 in it.
Why not define a v2 with a better signature? Although I realise that this is a
quality-of-implementation issue, why should an apparently mis-declared function
signature be considered acceptable? I do not agree that this enhancement should
be marked as resolved invalid: I think that is a cop-out frankly.